Who gets a seat when care policy is shaped?
A federal call for caregiving advisory-council nominations invites a wider question: how do organizations help people contribute meaningfully to decisions about the support they receive and provide?
Observations. Evidence. Ideas.
News, observations, and practical ideas for people who support care. Explore what is changing and what it means for your community.
Explore the research behind our workStart with a topic or a few words, or leave search blank to browse.
Search looks through titles, summaries, authors, and article text. With several words, each word must appear somewhere in the article.
Choose a theme to see its articles straight away. Your applied search and filters stay in place. Choose All themes to explore across themes.
For a closer match, open More filters and choose a setting, reader role, or article type, then select Apply filters. You can also enter words and choose Find articles. Results must match every option you choose. Leave an option set to All to keep that part open.
An article can belong to more than one theme. Explore what each covers and why we write about it.
Find articles relevant to a community, care setting, or organization. These options include people and partners as well as places:
Choose a perspective that interests you. You can read from any role:
No matches? Try fewer words or remove a filter. Clear filters clears your search and all selected options.
37 articles · Page 1 of 4
A federal call for caregiving advisory-council nominations invites a wider question: how do organizations help people contribute meaningfully to decisions about the support they receive and provide?
Recognition for an aging-services program can point others toward useful practice. The next step is to understand the people, expertise, and local arrangements behind it before deciding what might travel.
New federal nutrition-program awards emphasized testing and documenting approaches. A useful pilot should explain what was tried, what people experienced, and what another community would need to adapt it.
New federal Medicaid requirements and a legal challenge made clear explanations especially important in June 2026. Community partners can help people find qualified assistance without guessing how a rule applies to them.
HHS extended certain web and mobile accessibility compliance dates in May 2026. The extra time creates room for careful work, while people still need usable ways to take part today.
CMS proposed changes to drug prior authorization in April 2026. While proposals are considered, people still need an accurate explanation of their request and someone who can answer the next question.
A federal rural-health summit put long-term financing and workforce arrangements on the agenda. The practical lesson for partners is to plan the ordinary weeks after a new service opens.
CMS’s planned ACCESS model links technology-supported chronic care with clinical accountability. It prompts a practical question: who is responsible for the whole service around the tool?
A federal update on substance-use treatment records brings a wider service question into focus: can a person understand what information they are agreeing to share, and who can explain the choice?
Federal rural-health awards create room for state-led change. For a resident looking for help, the useful question is what is available nearby, who it serves, and how to begin.
Medicare plan ratings can support comparison, but they do not answer every personal question. A useful conversation puts the rating beside the person’s priorities and the details they need to confirm.
A Medicare payment rule creates additional options for integrating behavioral health with primary care. A useful offer needs a comfortable opening, clear responsibilities, and the person’s choice about what happens next.