Observations. Evidence. Ideas.
News, observations, and practical ideas for people who support care. Explore what is changing and what it means for your community.
Explore the research behind our workStart with a topic or a few words, or leave search blank to browse.
Search looks through titles, summaries, authors, and article text. With several words, each word must appear somewhere in the article.
Combine the options below, then choose Find articles. Results must match every option you choose. Leave an option set to All to keep that part open.
An article can belong to more than one theme. Explore what each covers and why we write about it.
Find articles relevant to a community, care setting, or organization. These options include people and partners as well as places:
Choose a perspective that interests you. You can read from any role:
No matches? Try fewer words or remove a filter. Clear filters clears your search and all selected options.
39 articles · Page 2 of 4
A launch session does not answer every question that appears during a shift. WHO/Europe’s workforce-readiness emphasis prompts a practical look at task-based practice, named help, and learning from repeated questions.
A small sensor can have a significant presence in someone’s home. Research-based design reflections prompt a household conversation about function, placement, other people in the space, and support after installation.
A functioning sensor is not the same as a meaningful benefit. A smart-home trial with mixed, time-dependent findings prompts a review centered on the person’s goal, everyday effort, and whether the arrangement still fits.
AI-assisted can mean many things. A patient-perspectives study prompts a more useful explanation: what the tool contributed, where important details came from, and who can answer a question about the result.
An initial yes can leave an important question unanswered. Research on consent for ambient documentation prompts a closer look at advance explanations, pauses, and an accurate account of the choices available.
Feedback means more when it can still change the experience. Qualitative research on patient participation prompts a practical approach to open decisions, accessible design sessions, and showing what changed afterward.
Knowing where to tap is different from understanding a tool’s purpose. Patient focus-group research prompts a practical introduction built around people’s questions, a concrete example, and a choice about how to participate.
An AI conversation may help someone explore a next step, but time spent chatting is not the whole story. An early study prompts careful questions about personal purpose, human connection, and useful choices beyond the screen.
An assistant may need to read a brochure, but the brochure should not expand its authority. NIST’s prompt-injection discussion prompts practical questions about source material, limited access, and reviewable actions.
A contact name does not explain what help someone provides or what information they may access. Research on caregiver documentation prompts a practical conversation about chosen support, clear roles, and changing arrangements.
Before a pilot begins, agree which task the tool will support and who will review the result. A medical-device draft offers a limited design prompt for a clearly bounded community invitation trial.
A video visit starts before the call connects. WHO–ITU accessibility guidance prompts a practical look at invitations, a chosen setup, supported participation, and what happens if the connection falters.
